CT ARES

Region 2

Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

Thoughts on Winlink,Classic Packet Radio, and APRS 11 months 3 days ago #880

  • WA1SFH
  • WA1SFH's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 738
  • Thank you received: 12
A case for getting you General License (or Extra) and operating HF

FACT: Traditional APRS, WInlink, and packet radio on VHF relies on a heck of a lot of infrastructure.
Simplex connections are possible, but Digieaters and igates provide the bulk of traffic capability on VHF/UHF.
There is also the issue of extremely limited range on VHF/UHF, using Grab 'n Go portable gear.

In contrast, HF APRS and Robust packet and Winlink VARA on HF provide range measured in the thousands of miles.
HF also allows us to achieve the same goals as our VHF counterparts.

APRS, APRS messaging, Winlink, and Classic Packet Radio on HF with the same amount of output power as VHF, albeit at lower bandwidth and throughput. Still, very little infrastructure required, which fits a Grid Down strategy of being prepared for a Black Sky Event

Food for thought!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.118 seconds